Talk:Rotax 914
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rotax 914 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I looked at the numbers at rotax own webpage, and they don't seem to agree with the numbers in this article. I think the weight of 78 kg, as listed here in wikipedia, is too much. If rotax page is correct, the 914 is in fact not much heavier than the 912ULS. The latter is said to weight 60kg on its wikipedia article. --Avl (talk) 17:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Aviation articles needing attention to referencing and citation
- Aviation articles needing attention to coverage and accuracy
- Aviation articles needing attention to grammar
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft engine articles
- Aircraft engine task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Start-Class Austria articles
- Low-importance Austria articles
- All WikiProject Austria pages
- Talk pages with comments before the first section