Talk:Robert Audi

Untitled

Hm, does the phrase "without pandering to the continental Zeitgeist" really suit the "Neutral point of view" standards? --134.184.67.185 14:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

(new author) Never edited anything here yet, so hoping a note will draw attention to this. In the article, it states " Baxter stated that the other side of the controversy ws represented by the scholars Robert Wolterstorff and Paul J. Weithman." I am pretty sure you mean Nicholas Wolterstorff, not "Robert Wolterstorff." Nicholas Wolterstorff and Audi discussed this topic in their written debate "Religion in the Public Square. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. 1997"

There is also a typo - "ws", should be "was." Timandmonica (talk) 09:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Religion in the public square

The section under this heading is deficient --- it does not clearly or fully state Audi's viewpoint or the opposing viewpoint. Please complete it with a full account. ---Dagme (talk) 02:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I have removed the section "Religion in the public square". As user Dagme pointed out, it lacked content on Audi's views. If someone feels that this content was important then I suggest they either rewrite it or put it into clear context to Audi's position.Phlsph7 (talk) 13:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)