Talk:Porcelain/Archives/2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Why is Japan listed but Korean porcelain only mentioned in passing
Please excuse my novice status on Wikipedia (never edited before), as someone researching porcelain cursorily, but it seems there is significant documentation of the Korean history of porcelain here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_pottery_and_porcelain) as well as its relation to (and seemingly foundational role in) the emergence of Japanese porcelain.
I'm not an expert on this area but it seems that there is also part of this that is related to forced labor/migration etc that isn't mentioned (based on the information on the Korean porcelain page.) Just a few thoughts about what seems to be a hole in the East Asian part of the history of this page. (unsigned)
- Yes, we should have a section. It is much less well known in the Wes though, as there was never a significant export trade. Johnbod (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)