Talk:Patron Capital
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved, uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Patron capital → Patron Capital – the name was badly created (before Patron capital) as all words should have capital letter at the beginningFifou1111 (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy support – There's no reason to think that the move could be controversial, so just do it instead of using an RM. Dicklyon (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Advertising and puffery
This article has issues with it's style and the adjectives used. The tag I placed previously was removed without discussion or comment. Please discuss these issues here before removing the tag again. TreacherousWays (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I have updated this article, amending the style, updating the information and adding the references. I would suggest that the tag can now be removed, unless there are further issues? Hgeorge22 (talk) 21:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)