Talk:NEXT for AUTISM

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

NEXT for AUTISM is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Criticism section inaccurate / out of date?

Hello there,

Complete Wikipedia layperson here, leaving this post here for a more experienced editor to take a look at for an edit, since I don't know how / don't have the time to leave an accurate enough edit to do this justice.

So it looks like around 2021 - 2022, there was a bit of an editing frenzy over the content of the article in regards to criticism of the organisation. This seems due, since their organization received a larger than normal volume of attention from Jimmy Kimmel / Mark Rober.

The criticism component has bounced back and forth from a moderately sized paragraph, down to a sentence, back up to a paragraph, and it was even removed at one point. The current sentence which represents the criticism portion (As of July 2024) is:

The organization has received criticism for its endorsement of Autism Speaks and applied behavior analysis.

My issue is, this statement is:

1) factually incorrect based off the organizations own published viewpoints :

https://nextforautism.org/about/ https://web.archive.org/web/20240601091202/https://nextforautism.org/about/ (most current wayback machine link for posterity)

Regarding autism speaks, while this page does list engagements they had with the organization, they list quite clearly at the bottom that: "We are not currently engaged with Autism Speaks."

As well, for applied behaviour analysis, there is no mention of explicit support in the about page.

2) has a dead link in the citation

https://roguerocket.com/2021/04/20/mark-rober-faces-backlash/ -this link is dead

In my opinion, this section could stand be more verbose, but for objectivities sake, the writing here, at the very least should match the actual views of the organization. Morrigannon (talk) 07:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:NEXT for AUTISM

Criticism section inaccurate / out of date?

Navigation menu

Search