Talk:My Father the Hero (1991 film)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Suggested split
I would wait until there is more development before splitting. Both films share the same plot anyway. Hoverfish Talk 13:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Removal of "needs infobox" tag
This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB. Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Proposed merger
This page was split from the 1994 version without concensus. There is hardly any development of either film and would sui one article alone. LizzieHarrison 16:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- The articles aren't very high quality admittedly but on a general principle I would think it is better to keep separate articles for the English language remakes of French films. -- Horkana (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- This seems to indicate French-language sources that mention the film in passing. I think it's enough to keep it split. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 19:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- What rationale was there to split the article in the first place? The French language film is notable but what secondary sources does the English language version have? LizzieHarrison 13:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Google News Search shows these. We just need to incorporate them to show more clearly that the film is notable. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 13:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- I appear to been the one that originally split the articles, although I really have no recollection, and can't really speak to the rationale for doing so. (I suspect I was merely acting on the split tag.) That said, I'm indifferent on the merge, and will defer to editors better acquainted with WP:FILM than I.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 23:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Google News Search shows these. We just need to incorporate them to show more clearly that the film is notable. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 13:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- What rationale was there to split the article in the first place? The French language film is notable but what secondary sources does the English language version have? LizzieHarrison 13:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- This seems to indicate French-language sources that mention the film in passing. I think it's enough to keep it split. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 19:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Lacks in enough motives to be merged with different article, as the English language version was commercial success [1] [2]. --Ferrie (talk) 11:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Disagree with merge. Although articles may need improving, these are two separate films, notable in their own right. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)