Talk:Museum of Ice Cream

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This should not be under museums it is a business

It is not an accredited museum it is a for profit business. The museum of sex is also not a museum same idea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flamingoflorida (talk • contribs) 07:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think, Flamingoflorida, you're doing a lot of WP:OR at Wikipedia. While sourced content and corrections are welcome, personal opinions and first-person experiences aren't acceptable. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the articles states it is an traveling interactive changing exhibit for profit that could never meet the qualifications for being a museum Flamingoflorida (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even if I agree, it doesn't matter. It's only relevant if you can produce published sources that state it's not a museum. Please read our guidelines. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The quote you removed about using the name the museum for understanding was relevant and should be brought back Flamingoflorida (talk) 07:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It took the founder's explanation and added original research to reach a conclusion. Again, please read our guidelines. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source