This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Ao4047 (talk·contribs) has been paid by Lucidworks. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
CommsKatieF (talk·contribs) has been paid by Lucidworks. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
Contributions to Solr
The current article text claims that Lucidworks employs one third of Apache Solr's committers and contributes 70% of the code. It's great that Lucidworks is a major supporter of the open source Solr project, and they should definitely get some recognition and credit here. However, those very concrete claims need sourcing. Or perhaps the claims should be slightly toned down to something that can be sourced somehow.
Besides that, some explanation would be helpful. Is this referring just to the API wrapper around the Apache Lucene search engine, which is what Solr has become nowadays? If so, that's still great, but it's not nearly as impressive, and should be made clear. And if it's also referring to contributions to the underlying Lucene search engine, I have a hard time believing those percentages, given the massive contributions that the Elasticsearch project has been making to Lucene during the past few years.StormWillLaugh (talk) 08:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Request edit on 12 September 2021
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
As of Sept 7th, 2021, Lucidworks has a new logo:
Wikipedia entries should have updated logos.:
Compare the current site to an archive (old logo in right-side hero/header graphic). The logo has changed.: