Talk:Karabiner 98k

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Grammar

Hello

While describing the rifle, past tense was used in some instances incorrectly.

In this article, saying that "K98k was a bolt action rifle..." would mean that either no K98k's exist anymore or it is no longer a bolt action rifle. The correct saying therefore is "K98k is a bolt action rifle...".

Feedback

Why did it cock on opening? What's the advantage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stronger primary extraction--Grasyl (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Karabiner 98k

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Karabiner 98k's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "WHO":

  • From Chiang Kai-shek rifle: https://www.warhistoryonline.com/guest-bloggers/unexpected-partnership-nazi-germany-republic-china.html
  • From Denmark: "Life expectancy". World Health Organization. 6 July 2016. Archived from the original on 16 October 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@.RUAAC: could you please fill in the ref mentioned here that you added last year? -- Fyrael (talk) 20:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I've filled it in. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

German Infantry Doctrine

This is a poorly sourced and cited section, containing a measly 3 sources that only loosely correlate to the topic at hand. Between this fact, and with consideration to the fact that not a single other article for any small arm on the English Wikipedia contains a section dedicated not to the firearm itself, but instead to a supposed doctrinal usage for one country in a small period of time that the weapon saw use, I advocate for the deletion of this section. 68.116.213.239 (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Loafiewa (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ZF39 scope

I would expand this section with ZF39 Scope https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/world-war-ii-german-sniper-systems-rifles-optics-ammo/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdxVqFX9Iwo WWIIEnjoyer (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]