Talk:Jones v. Harris Associates

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

judges' names should not have "J" after them. this is wikipedia, not an awful casebook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.98.130 (talk) 18:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Holding in the infobox

The current holding in the infobox reads: "The claim is valid under The Investment Company Act nevaise the fee is so large is proportion to the services rendered."

I'm not really sure what was intended here, but it should be rewritten to be comprehensible English. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations

The quotations from Easterbrook and Posner are far too long, and should be summarized. 121a0012 (talk) 06:58, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jones v. Harris Associates

Holding in the infobox

Quotations

Navigation menu

Search