Talk:In-image advertising

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

It's legit! Really!

This article is in the editing phase. It should not be deleted because it has substantial sources, including a scholarly article and an article from the New York Times, and is written with a neutral tone.

To the participants in the long-running edit war on this article

Please stop the long-running revert war on this article. I have semi-protected the article itself, so the if you want to edit it, you will need to register a Wikipedia account first. Instead of merely reversing one another's changes, please discuss any changes to that page here, so that consensus can be achieved according to Wikipedia's editing rules. -- The Anome (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for "In-image advertising" revert

My research on in-image advertising led to a TechCrunch article indicating it was GumGum, not Picad Media, that created the first in-image ads in February of 2008. The TechCrunch article cited in relation to Picad Media creating the first in-image ads states the company launched in September, 2008. If these facts are inaccurate or there is another reason for reverting my entry, please explain. Thank you. (Tonywinders (talk) 03:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC))[reply]