Talk:Hajong language

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Population

The two numbers given on this page for the Hajong population differ widely i.e. 175,000 and 19,000 (in the box). I suggest changing both of those to match the current ethnologue data which says 68,000 including Bangladesh and India.Virginia C. Phillips (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts

@Chaipau, Austronesier, Za-ari-masen, and Msasag: The source specifically mentions 'scripts' and not 'alphabets'. It says "Bengali (Bangla) script [Beng], used in Bangladesh and India." Now since in Wikipedia 'Bengali' script refers to the Bengali-Assamese script, I believe we should only mention Bengali-Assamese script in the lead and infobox and remove this text → "Assamese in Assam and Bengali in Bangladesh" which is unsourced here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was also thinking about this. In some places we have Assamese, in some it's Bengali etc and being in scripts sections they refer to the alphabet articles. I think these should be changed to "Bengali-Assamese script". Msasag (talk) 07:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Fylindfotberserk and Msasag: Indeed. In this particular case this source calls it Assamese script because of the use of the Assamese ; but Hajong also uses (page 2 of the PDF) which is a part of neither Bengali nor Assamese alphabets. I am giving this detail just to illustrate the point that we should use "Bengali-Assamese" whenever a script is mentioned. Chaipau (talk) 08:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't this be by Wiki-logic the "Hajong alphabet"? ;) Pinging @Glennznl (as a regular contributor to script-related pages, including Bengali–Assamese script): what's your take on this? –Austronesier (talk) 12:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Bengali-Assamese script, as alphabet (on Wikipedia atleast) means the variety of a script used by a specific language. Applying that logic, it would be the "Hajong alphabet" of the Bengali-Assamese script. Hajong alphabet or script doesn't give any results in Google Scholar however, so I would stick to Bengali-Assamese script. Glennznl (talk) 14:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Austronesier: yes, it should be "Hajong alphabet". From what I see it uses a contracted list of consonants from Bangali-Assamese. Just as Manipuri too does use a contracted list [1]. Chaipau (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]