This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Education in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomEducation in the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
I believe the content, though sourced, gives undue weight to an reported event and should be removed unless more sourcing is found. Don't knw which version I protected, but let's thrash this out here, shall we? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 11 June 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Done due to good-faith challenge to uncited contentious BLP material. I would not object to re-adding the removed material if it is accompanied by a source. —KuyaBriBriTalk16:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Done due to good-faith challenge to uncited contentious BLP material. I would not object to re-adding the removed material if it is accompanied by a source. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)