Talk:Godwin-Austen Glacier

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Godwin-Austen Glacier article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Glaciers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Focus is on Concordia?

This would be a better article if it focused on the glacier itself. Most of it is copied from the Concordia (Pakistan) article, which is redundant. Yes, I know, I should just put in new content, and not just complain. -- Spireguy 04:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Godwin-Austen Glacier

Focus is on Concordia?

Navigation menu

Search