Talk:Epang Palace

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Contradiction to be resolved

Pankenier exaggerates saying that Epang was the largest palatial complex (did he mean "one piece structure"?) of China, since there was Weiyang. It is unclear whether Epang was actually completed. The Wiki article in discussion gives a link to some tiny newspaper note in English, which does not specify what was the measure of "incompleteness", and what research is implied. Pankenier specifies Xu W.-M. 2000, Qin ducheng yanjiu, Shaanxi renmin jiaoyu, Xi’an.--Shanghainese.ua (talk) 08:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Epang Palace

Contradiction to be resolved

Navigation menu

Search