Talk:Djibouti at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DatGuy (talk · contribs) 19:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- First review! I've seen other reviews, so I'll try and base this one off them. Will get the comments done by a maximum of two days hopefully :). Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
|
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. | Judo could probably be expanded a bit more (add the score, how the opponent did, etc.) but it looks good! Dat GuyTalkContribs 21:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC) |
- I'll leave more comments once the sections have been expanded. All I could see :). Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I specifically moved the citations out of the tables and moved them inline with the text because I thought they didn't look good in the table format. Do you want them both inline and in the table, or just in one, and do you have a preference? Kees08 (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- I think a reference for the time would be nice for the reader. I have also updated one of the comments. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- I have striken the table-comment.
@DatGuy: Anything else you would like me to do? Kees08 (talk) 07:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)