Talk:Delta Cafe/GA1

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 13:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Back here, Another Believer. Will be reviewing this article. GeraldWL 13:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Waldo Luis, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and references

[haha, spotted]

Sources

All good. GeraldWL 13:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images

All images are relevant and have appropriate captions and under free license. The restaurant signage image seemed vague as the sign has been seen at the infobox image; I think that can be replaced by other stuff. GeraldWL 08:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Waldo Luis, I have plans to photograph of the restaurant's exterior, which should show the mural. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna be quick here *takes breath*

Neutral yes, stable yes, broad yes, focus yes. GeraldWL 08:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

My extensive conclusion of the article and whether it would pass the GA criteria and how it could--

 Passed (this is not a flight review, it's not that long)

Still not taking place; see prose section. GeraldWL 15:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.