Talk:CiteScore

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Open Access Mid‑importance

CiteScore is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Open Access to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect)
Cleanup : Access2Research
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles.
Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess;
- Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

Camel case

I'm in favour of writing simply Citescore. Camel case spelling looks too much of a marketing trick here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.217.194 (talk) 08:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's a common marketing trick. I agree that Citescore should be the way to write it here Pot (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

example for new calculation is wrong

The calculation for CS_2021 seems wrong. According to the formula it should be the following: (CS_2021 = CS_2021 + CS_2020 + CS_2019 + CS_2018) / (Publications_2021 + Publication_2020 + Publications_2019 + Publications_2018) 92.201.107.255 (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The graph

The graph showing "CiteScore vs. IF for American Chemical Society (ACS, green) and Nature group journals (blue)" has no source reference. Who published it, and where the numbers come from?

Also, I am not sure I understand it. It shows that Nature benefits from IF, but the stated reason does no look clear. It says that Nature's disadvantage when using Citescore is due to Nature including many editorials (which, I suppose, get few citations thus diluting the journals' CiteScore but not the journals' IF). If that is the case, the reasoning should be more explicit and cite a source. Pot (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:CiteScore

Camel case

example for new calculation is wrong

The graph

Navigation menu

Search