Talk:Alexandra Cardenas

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it already has two detailed references in national/international media. --Yaxu (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, this is clearly of importance, Alexandra is a major performer and initiator of the highly notable Algorave movement. Yaxu (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I've added a link to an interview for Tracks on Arte TV, which was broadcast internationally in two different languages (in Germany and France). I think along with the other references this establishes that she has "become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style", so will remove the tag for now. Yaxu (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

from what I can see the article fails WP:NMG, that's why it was listed. Sent to XfD. Semitransgenic talk. 15:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No it doesn't, have you actually read WP:NMG? I was referring to it above. That's a real shame you couldn't just discuss it here. Yaxu (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
better to break out discussion at XfD, if consensus supports that it's notable, then no problem, it stays. Semitransgenic talk. 17:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating for deletion without reading the sources properly, or spending a moment discussing them here to make sure you understand them, is a waste of time. Yaxu (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
sure, you are entitled to your opinion, but as someone with a clear professional investment in this topic, your view is perhaps a little coloured here, that's why it's best to get broader input. I really don't see the issue with this. Semitransgenic talk. 23:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please consider WP:BEFORE in the future rather than leaping to nominate for deletion. Yaxu (talk) 09:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
maybe also consider WP:COI next time you use wikipedia for SEO purposes. Semitransgenic talk. 15:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you need to read, absorb and apply WP:Dead horse. Give it a rest. We have an encyclopædia to build, and we need to do it together. 7&6=thirteen () 16:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! Yaxu (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]