Talk:Aileen Cannon

Early life and education. Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 February 2024

In Section

   Early life and education

there is a Reference

   <ref name=Wilner>

The article in the Reference is archived. But on 2023-02-14 the URL for the original article was still valid.

Into the Cite template, please insert

   | url-status=live

71.162.138.11 (talk) 19:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 19:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome. Sorry for not checking the reply page sooner. 71.162.138.11 (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Political Party

Judges are non-partisan, and in point of fact, no other judge from the Southern District of Florida has a political party appended to their biography. Judge Cannon's biography should have the same designations as the other judges - either all should be called out by the political party of their nominator, or none. This article should be edited to reflect that change. 2601:601:181:7DF0:9493:A65D:BFB2:6CF3 (talk) 17:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

They should be non-partisan but their strange and errornous rulings help Trump's delay tactics. So she's either partisan or incompetent. --Denniss (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

In her case, probably both. 24.184.206.22 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

The problem with this article as I see it is that news articles about politically contentious current issues are clearly not appropriate encylcopedic references ( if you disagree, find me at least two other encylopedias that allow sourcing claims this way Therfore much of the article is inappeopriately sourced in any event such that the article aa written clearly violates WP:NPOV on the face of it because the media is simply not a enclyclopedically factual source of information due to their clearly undeniable political party affilliations. Therefore, Im in favor of placing the POV dispute tag on this article until we have non-media primary factual sources of high quality to substantiate the claims such that we prevent inappropriate DNC soapboxing on Wikipedia in line with the 501C3 requirement that Wikimedia foundation cant engage in politics without automatically loosing their 501C3 tax exempt staus. 2600:8804:6F12:5800:6045:30E5:ED86:BA99 (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2024

change

The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse> Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]

to

The hearing featured five judicial nominees, with Republican senators focused on questioning J. Philip Calabrese and Democratic senators focused on questioning Toby Crouse. Afterward Democratic senators sent Cannon many follow-up questions to answer.[14][21]

(Replace > by .) Quantum menace (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Jamedeus (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Broken ref

Heads up that ref 106 is currently broken 104.232.119.107 (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Many thanks. If the orphan ref "hugo" was meant to be the same as that defined as "lowell" which quickly follows it (Lowell, Hugo; Joseph, Cameron (May 8, 2024). "Judge scraps date for Trump Mar-a-Lago documents trial without rescheduling". The Guardian. Retrieved May 8, 2024.), then I've fixed it. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2024

There is a typo for the source for footnote 124. The newspaper "Guardian" is misspelled. Joe (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Thanks, I've corrected that. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

11th circuit “admonished”

In the paragraph regarding the 11th circuit, reversing her ruling in the Trump case the sentence says she was reversed and admonished. The term admonishment means disciplined within the legal profession. Other judges have been admonished, but that is always by the judicial council of that circuit. There was no disciplinary action taken, regard to judge Cannon us using the word admonishment is legally incorrect. Be more accurate to use different words to describe the reversal without display action. 207.65.52.25 (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Is "rebuked" better than "admonished", per source? I've made the change, but feel free to revert me if you disagree. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)