Talk:1910 Chalmers Award

This is a badly written article in which allegations are not sourced directly

This is one of the worst written articles I have come across. It is incomplete, when describing the controversy and unclear, though that likely is due to bad writing. Montju (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~~~~
added reference from a book written on the award

--Akrasia25 (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

"Mistakenly" counted twice?

Not necessarily. Knowing how the Browns had conspired to give Lajoie the title, it's possible Ban Johnson had it counted twice on purpose in order to nullify Lajoie's tainted would-be title. Can I prove that? No. Nor can researchers prove it was "mistakenly" counted twice. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 11:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Photo

The picture posted with this entry is the most hilarious thing I've ever seen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.117.127 (talk) 19:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

If it is, then you need to get out more. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 19:50, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually, it's very funny. 129.116.71.114 (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You mean the part where Lajoie is saying, "My average is bigger than your average"? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 19:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Chalmers award

Please reference the Total Baseball Encyclopedia for a different (and more logical) rendition of the 1910 debacle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.249.197.250 (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC)