Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nursing

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Project Talk Members Templates Assessment
Welcome to the Nursing WikiProject
This page is a place to discuss issues related to Wikipedia's nursing articles. Please keep it civil. This is not the place to ask about your own medical conditions or help with school assignments.

Please add new sections at the end of the page. Discussion threads will be automatically archived.

Florence is watching
General Wikipedia Links WikiProject Medicine Links
Plain English. Avoid complete bollocks! Project page, talk page.
How to satisfy Criterion 1a (for feature candidates). Manual of style (use this for nursing articles too).
Be bold, and use references. Featured articles for inspiration.
Archives: Index1

Need help at Nurse Anesthetist / Nurse Anesthesiologist

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed for deletion (PROD): Advance for NPs & PAs nursing journal

FYI, the article Advance for NPs & PAs has been proposed for deletion (WP:PROD). The first sentences summarize the subject thusly:

  • "Advance for NPs & PAs is a peer-reviewed nursing journal covering the practices of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. It is the official journal of the Association of Family Practice Physician Assistants and the National Association of Dermatology Nurse Practitioners."

The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:

  • "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do.

Thanks, A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 00:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's an ongoing RfC at Talk:Richard D. Gill#Rfc - Kate Shemirani radio show appearance of relevance to this project. Structuralists (talk) 21:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nurse Practitioner talk page

I need help on the nurse practitioner talk page in building consensus for changes. Hue16459 (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mid level page recommended for deletion

I have recommended the mid-level practitioner page for deletion. Please join the conversation. Hue16459 (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming mid-level practitioner

Please see Talk:Mid-level practitioner#Requested move 12 December 2023. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]