User talk:Kaliru
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||
Nomination of KM. Annamalai for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KM. Annamalai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
RationalPuff (talk) 17:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
M. Mathiventhan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, M. Mathiventhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 06:24, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Yes... But I'm creating the page. Working in progress. He is a Minister of Tamilnadu Government. Shanthosh Raja Yuvaraj 💓 (talk) 06:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
The article Sri Muthukumara Samy Temple, Vennandur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Small insignificant temple with no sources available online.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Sri Muthukumara Samy Temple, Vennandur for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Muthukumara Samy Temple, Vennandur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Venkat TL (talk) 10:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Sri Iynthu Muniyappan Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Small insignificant temple with no sources available online. Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Muthukumara Samy Temple, Vennandur
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |