This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
How does this tie back to ISO?...
I like the material and its organization.. it fits with some of the plans I have for some of the articles I intend to write.. but does ISO consider this to be part of its scope?.... This seems to come out nowhere.. like an orphan section of the article.. can anyone explain this to me?... many thanks
Hi Risk Engineer, Thanks for your comment. Short answer, yes. Please browse each of the ISO links in this template, and I think you'll see. ISO's voluntary standards cover a range of social and environmental accountability areas. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Photo
This photo is misleading, becaouse presents only one aspect of the social and environmental accountability subject. --IM-yb (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, IM-yb. Thanks for your comment. Could you explain, please, what you mean by misleading? Would not any image 'present only one aspect' of such a broad topic? Overall, I think the image enhances the navigation box. Apparently you disagree. Can you suggest another image that would be better. Very open to suggestions. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, DASonnenfeld. The image about oil cleanup after Valdez spill is too far away to connected with the fair trade or Aarhus Convention or sustainability reporting and others. Not represents all this articles. That is misleading. I believe that is difficult to suggest another image to this wide range of topics. --IM-yb (talk) 00:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
