Talk:Tendinopathy

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tendinopathy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Tendinosis

Should tendinosis not have its own article or section at least? This article has a nice explanation, but I do not feel comfortable to write about this as I do not have a medical background: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312643/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfgang-gerlach (talk • contribs) 14:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

spelling

Both i and o are correct, but could we agree on one of them? --92.208.247.86 (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nutraceuticals

This recently added section looks like a promotion, tagged. Best 78.15.161.228 (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get the numbers right

The second paragraph of this article starts, "Three terms have evolved in the medical terminology to refer to injuries that cause tendon pain:" and it then goes on to list five terms as bullet points.

Perhaps there is a historical reason why this has happened - maybe an editor accumulating the two later terms into the bullets from following text. So perhaps they deserve a different bullet list with their own introductory clause. But whatever the reason or however it might better be expressed, it doesn't read well at the current time.

Since I am not any kind of subject expert, it would probably be better for an editor who is more knowledgeable to perform the necessary textual surgery. Hedles (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prefered term

This is the preferred term per MeSH with the other two being technically slight narrower but often used synonymously. https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D052256 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number of alternative names in the first sentence

Generally we just pick two and put the rest in the infobox. There are lots. I do not care which two. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]