Talk:Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
|
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
note
doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01485.x - MELD predicts SBP risk. JFW | T@lk 10:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Conn
According to doi:10.3748/wjg.15.1042, Conn was the first to use the term SBP (PMID 14138877) but there had been previous reports. JFW | T@lk 10:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Error
This article is not talking about SPB, rather the contents is currently a general article about liver failure. SPB is a very important complication that is worried about when a patient presents with ascities and I think this article is definitely worth working on.Fuj (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- It was overwritten with some sort of other content. I got rid of it. JFW | T@lk 19:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Edits
Madhero88 (talk · contribs) asked me to comment on the current state of the article. I felt some references were probably too weak from a WP:MEDRS perspective. The WJG reviews are fairly useful. I would still like to recommend PMID 19160207 (Cochrane Review for antibiotics). PMID 18417037 is a recent review that is potentially more authoritative, coming from Pere Gines. JFW | T@lk 19:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)