Talk:Simeprevir

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Chatleym, Rev20one, Mchernovsan. Peer reviewers: JMa133, Hnublis, NouL, Rpark0211.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

We are planning on expanding adverse effects and improving on flow/readability, decreasing medical jargon. We are planning on looking up other sources and thinking as non pharmacy students in order to simplify medical jargon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchernovsan (talkcontribs) 17:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the MOA to be just a little more descriptive. Planning to work on the PK/PD/PG section next. Gmsah (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite dated - simeprevir's main use these days is not in triple therapy but in combination with sofosbuvir in interferon-free threrapy 62.7.175.18 (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked your page on 11/14/16 @ 2120 for potential plagiarism. Went through each reference and was not able to find any plagiarized material on your wiki page. JMa133 (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I verified that the page has cited secondary sources that are verifiable. I found that source 20 is the same as source 9, to consolidate the two. As well, source 4, 6, 18 and 19 do not link out to articles or sources. This is either due to the article being removed or lack of public access. Rpark0211 (talk) 06:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The edits that were made and the overall formatting and styling is consistent with Wikipedia's manual of style for medicine-related articles. Medical jargon is limited for the most important information and used when necessary to describe mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics. Concepts and ideas are explained in easy to understand 'plain English' wording. The order of the sections are in-line with Wikipedia's manual. A couple of suggestions I have would be: Link the first time "protease inhibitor" shows up with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protease_inhibitor_(pharmacology) as some may not know what a protease inhibitor is. Same idea for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_load. Also, instead of using "subjects" or "patients," you could possibly use "people" or "women" when appropriate. Kevin.tran (talk) 18:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The draft submission has neutral coverage. There are no assumptions of facts and the editors did not draw any conclusions. They included relevant information with reliable sources. NouL (talk) 19:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical Structure should contain Z olefine not E

Simeprevir contains a double bond in Z configuration not E. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm401507s 130.83.196.19 (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]