Talk:Product recall

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Added Link

Added link to CPSC, previous link was to a site which was not particularly useful or easy to navigate and full of sponsored links to businesses with recalled items via google adwords.

Decision to recall

First an excerpt:

From: Fight Club, 1999, Fox 

JACK (V.O.)
I'm a recall coordinator. My job is to apply the formula.
....
JACK (V.O.)
Take the number of vehicles in the field, (A), and multiply it by the probable rate of failure, (B), then multiply the result by the average out-of- court settlement, (C). A times B times C equals X...

JACK
If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

BUSISNESS WOMAN
Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

JACK
Oh, you wouldn't believe.

BUSINESS WOMAN
... Which... car company do you work for?

JACK
A major one.


Does anyone know if a procedure like this is actually used to determine whether to recall a product? Which profession would be used to make such a decision (e.g. an actuary?). If this sort of thing is the case, I think a new section should be made for the article.
--216.138.75.50 14:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the 1970's there was a big scandal about the Ford Pinto and a problem with its fuel tank which caused it to explode. Ford knew about the problem but took a decision that fighting the lawsuits was cheaper than re-designing the car. I'm guessing that a accountant would make the decision using net present value calculations.Ford_Pinto#Safety_problems_and_scandal Rfidjack (talk) 19:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this true?

"In the case of a compulsory recall, consumers who fail to dispose of it or return it to the manufacturer for replacement or refund could be fined for as much as $5000."

Is this true? I'm not sure whether or not to remove it. 'FLaRN'(talk) 22:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it, here is a recall letter issued by the FDA with information for the patient/consumer and there is no mention about any fines. FDA recall letter.Rfidjack (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What $$ are you talking about? 145.53.180.22 (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time editing an entry, so I hope I do it right. But somebody has to do something about this ridiculous line, which has been there for more than 4 years, so I am going to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athomeinkobe (talk • contribs) 22:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted paragraph

I deleted the paragraph

"A good example is the recent recall of over 500,000 Toyota Tundra pickup trucks. The Tundra had a ball joint problem which resulted in 11 accidents, forcing the manufacturer to attempt to right the problem.[1]

Toyota has never had a mandated recall. TMS always repairs their vehicles before the government mandates action. This is not a good example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.177.12.38 (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To fix article

Welcome to Wikipedia. I was going to fix the article, Product recall. Please do not change it. Thank you. 61.9.65.95 (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New sections, add links to current recalls?

Lenovo recently recalled batteries, I came here to find a list of other battery recalls, as probably many do perhaps a section for laptop battery recalls should be made, with links to recall programs. This suggestion also applies to other currently ongoing recalls. Bauksitt (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is not a very good idea for several reasons
1) Wikipedia is not a news-site but an encyclopedia trying to give a stable view of an issue. Having open recalls linked is not very encyclopedic.
2) If we want to list currently ongoing recalls, this requires that these are removed later on; which will create maintenance nightmares; I do not think having a continuously updated list of current recalls is feasible.
3) There are probably many dozens open recalls at any moment (not only to electronics but also to foods, cars, toys, etc etc etc). It is impossible to list them all.
4) Even if we were to list them all, do we want to list all open recalls? Consider a (hypothetical) recall of Yak-milk in a single Mongolese province, or for that matter a recall of cars only in the USA? What use has this information to readers not from these regions, besides cluttering the article. In other words, how do we determine whether a recall is notable enough for inclusion? Arnoutf (talk) 15:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is this

1998 USA (1998-1999): Chevrolet Malibu incident: Failure to recall resulted in multiple fatal occurrences What is the source on this? More importantly, what is it talking about —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.220.58.62 (talk) 04:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add to recalls

Add Ford's 2008 recall of 16 million 1992-2003 model-year vehicles with cruise control deactivation switches that spontaneously caught on fire; that recall was much larger than Toyota's gas pedal recall and it spanned over 18 years.

Also, add Honda's 2009 recall of 1 million 2001-2003 model-year vehicles with driver's side air bags that deployed so aggressively that the inflator ruptured and sent metal fragments into the passenger compartment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.48.35 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requirements

What are the Requirements for a recall to happen on any specific product? And how is this number determined? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.64.187 (talk) 20:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For pharmacaceuticals the requirements for a recall on any specific product are given in the law in 21 CFR Part 7. I will try adding them.Lodder (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Product recall

Cyberbot II has detected links on Product recall which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.sgs.com/en/Our-Company/News-and-Media-Center/News-and-Press-Releases/2012/01/From-Recall-to-Prevention.aspx
    Triggered by \bsgs\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Product recall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Product recall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup

For readability, it seems that the list of product recalls could be moved to an appropriately named list article (List of Product Recalls, perhaps), and this article simply discuss in prose the topic itself (and perhaps a few highlights). Right now the layout is pretty obnoxious, in my opinion. Thoughts? Dbsseven (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright cleanup

Content added by 67.184.212.160 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. -- 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 20:45, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

cpsc.gov links 404'ing

The cpsc.gov links are now resulting in 404s, though they were luckily archived on the Wayback Machine. Could someone replace them? Cuz I'm too lazy to replace them all in one edit. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 13:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2008 recall of Sure-Lites emergency lighting

Would the 2008 recalls on Sure-Lites emergency lighting be notable enough to add to this article? If needed, I can provide links to a Sure-Lites catalog, the CPSC recall notice, and will help with adding content 2189 is out of order (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Product_recall"