Talk:Median nerve palsy

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Review

Hello. I saw the request for review, and have made some edits to the page. I have two additional broad comments. One is to make sure that you have not copied material word-for-word from any copyrighted source. The other is to note that, as a matter of policy, Wikipedia articles must not contain any medical advice. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References need to be consistently formatted using the cite template [1] Text should also be written in prose rather than point form. The article uses terms like "physician may recommend". Facts supported by appropriate refs should just be stated. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all let me say that the article is informative and generally quite OK, although there is lot that can be done to make it even better. More use of references would be a great improvement: prevention, treatment and epidemiology almost completely unsourced. It would also be great to have an infobox in the lead and a history section. As partly pointed in comments above addressing readers is not encyclopedic: e.g: about the risks involved in hurting your wrist and hand. Such expressions should be reworded. Treatment section is a bit opaque for lay readers: it could be improved with more wikilinks and short explanations on the most difficult terms. More images would be great. I have also noticed that the image of the ape hand was uploaded to commons by one of the editors: a higher quality upload of the image would be much better (no size problems in commons). I hope it helps... Bests. --Garrondo (talk) 07:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Median nerve palsy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Editing the page as part of an assignment

Hi Wikipedians I will be editing this page in the coming days as part of an assignment. I am starting to gather sources that are reliable to use and the following two are the ones I got so far. Please let me know if you find anything wrong with them because of which I should not consider using them. Thank You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AAligXLJ1A

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1242387-overview

Syedm191 (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at WP:MEDRS eMedicine is covered by "Peer-reviewed medical information resources such as WebMD, UpToDate, and eMedicine are usually acceptable sources for uncontroversial information; however, as much as possible Wikipedia articles should cite the more established literature directly." I would avoid the youtube one. It may be acceptable as it appears to be produced by a valid medical faculty but you'll likely be able to find something more appropriate without too much trouble. If you don't have access to anything more appropriate you can probably use it for now. PriceDL (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Median nerve palsy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]