Talk:Ichthyoallyeinotoxism

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why is there so little research into this?

why is there so little research into this? not only in their entheogenic value but also understanding and avoiding accidental consumption. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.7.149.178 (talk) 06:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ethical implications

I would like to start a discussion regarding the use of animals as entheogens. In the history of mankind, use of entheogenic substances has been prevalent and wide spread as a source of altering consciousness for a variety of purposes. Should we feel different about harvesting a plant for consumption versus an animal for consumption (terminal) for a hallucinatory experience? --CATFARTS (talk) 05:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Voluntary ingestion?

I am not sure if anybody would ever ingest a poisonous fish with these effects on a voluntary base. That the fish was indeed eaten intentionally by ancient Romans cannot be deduced from the links and sources given. Furthermore, there might be other effects depending on the dose or type of poisonous fish ingested. Even comparing it to LSD is problematic, as this substance is, despite its pronounced psychoactive effects not very toxic and does not lead to discernible toxic reactions other than hallucinations and psychosis. This is clearly a case for toxicology and not for the experimental drug seeker. (Osterluzei (talk) 10:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ichthyoallyeinotoxism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LSD-like hallucinations

From what I can see from experience reports, Sarpa Salpa (at least) isn't LSD-like but is more akin to datura or another deliriant drug whereas LSD is a psychedelic. I think this might be case of people calling any hallucinogenic drug 'LSD-like'. I'm sure reliable sources don't exist on this issue - perhaps we could delete the 'LSD-like' descriptor instead? Earfetish1 (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]