Talk:Fuchs' dystrophy

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ophthalmology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Fuchs' dystrophy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

On 23 August 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Fuchs's dystrophy. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Removed apparently irrelevant anecdote

As a newcomer to this page, I thought I would explain my removal. As raised at WikiProject medicine, the bit about botulinum toxin appeared to be irrelevant (since spasm is not otherwise mentioned in the article); in addition, the wording ("anecdotally") suggested it was original research and it lacked reliable sourcing. Removed. -- Scray (talk) 21:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fuchs' dystrophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050327021720/http://www.nei.nih.gov:80/health/cornealdisease/index.asp to http://www.nei.nih.gov/health/cornealdisease/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Links added.

I added the following internal links: "genetics", "heterogeneous disease", and "loci". Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 23:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bayes' theorem which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Different forms or different stages?

Greetings,

In the little "Genes include" chart, I find:

Type-----OMIM----Gene-------Locus
______________________________________
FECD1--136800--COL8A2---1p34.3-p32.3
FECD4--610206--SLC4A11--20p13-p12
FECD6--189909--ZEB1-------10p11.2

Since the article states that there are 4 stages of the condition, not 6, I presume that there are at least 6 different types of FECD. However, I do not see that in the article. Please clarify.

Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]