Talk:Follicular lymphoma

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

External Links

One or two of the external links listed at the end of this article don't seem to meet the standards one usually expects of Wikipedia articles. The links contain information that is either a duplicate of information found elsewhere (I'm thinking of the "Lymphoma Information Network" page), or non-authoritative (the link to the page at lymphomation.org).

I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor, however, so I'm hesitant to make any changes. I thought, however, that I would bring them to the attention of more regular editors.

I'm basing my assessment on what I have seen as far as standards required for external links at other, related, Wikipedia entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.247.154.34 (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted two of the three external links because the first one, "An integrative medicine approach" is alternative cures oriented and this person is regarded as a quack by the established medical community. I deleted "Lymphoma Information Network" because it doesn't have anything not found in this Wikipedia article and is overflowing with ads. I left the lymphomation.org link because it is a good resource for someone trying to learn about follicular lymphoma.TL36 (talk) 04:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

transformed follicular lymphoma not mentioned

Could/should this article mention or describe transformed follicular lymphoma ? As in A Study ... of GSK2816126 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell and Transformed Follicular Lymphoma. - Rod57 (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now described

The revised article now describes transformed follicular lymphoma. joflaher (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UK guideline

doi:10.1111/bjh.16872 JFW | T@lk 10:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Too advanced?

The text looks more like a chapter from a medical textbook than an encyclopedic article. 109.108.203.236 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]