Talk:Clobazam
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Clobazam.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Clobazam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Synthesis
Is the 1972 synthesis shown still the method used. In one of my books, they quote production prices of 100-150USD/Kg (and 200-300USD/Kg for lorazepam). I appreciate scale and a devoted production line all help, but it seems very cheap even so. I'm searching patents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.56.145 (talk • contribs) 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Onfi / ONFI redirect
I arrived at the Clobazam page when searching onfi (lower or mixed case), but was trying to get to ONFI ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_NAND_Flash_Interface_Working_Group ). I added a redirect explanation but it was immediately removed as unrelated. Worth noting that the ONFI article has a redirect explanation to Clobazam, so it makes sense to me to have one going the other way too. 212.20.255.146 (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @212.20.255.146:, thanks for your message on my talkpage. I apologise for wrongfully reverting your edit, I didn't understand your intention and seemed to me totally unrelated to the article's topic (actually I didn't carefully read the incipit of the article). To fix the problem I would suggest to change the redirect page Onfi to a disambiguation page with both links, i.e. Open NAND Flash Interface Working Group and Clobazam. Regards, --DoebLoggs (talk) 13:41, 8 August 2019 (UTC)