Talk:Choroideremia

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The link between the missing REP1 gene and choroideremia

'The disease has been traced to a specific area of the X gene.'

There is no such thing as an X-gene, only an X chromosome and it is already stated that this disease is X-linked

'Lack of this protein [REP1] keeps essential nutrients from reaching the eye, causing deterioration of the above-mentioned layers in the back of the eye.'

This is roughly what is said on the choroideremia foundation page, in fact that even said that there is a total lack of REP2 in the eye, hence the disease only affecting the eye. That is wrong. If you really had no REP whatsoever, you would have no funtional Rabs and the tissue would die. Rabs are involved in vesicle trafficking, this is not really related to nutrients at all. The link between the loss of REP1 and choroideremia is not known. ChristineD 15:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mortality?

I was unable to find any study discussing mortality related to this disorder. The article only mentions eye problems and no other problems. Being blind is not generally related to mortality, so it's not clear how this disease could lead to mortality. Scholar gives low numbers of hits for the relevant queries. Thus it seems that it doesn't affect mortality, but we can't write this because of WP:SYN.

If someone comes across a good source on this, please add it. --Deleet (talk) 17:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Choroideremia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]