Talk:Apremilast
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Apremilast.
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Apremilast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150531020846/http://www.utopharm.com/youchuo_en/news_sub.aspx?id=61 to http://www.utopharm.com/youchuo_en/news_sub.aspx?id=61
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Investigational use - edit reverted
I reverted this edit on use of apremilast to treat lichen planus, which was not sourced to WP:MEDRS standards and would have violated our Manual of Style with regard to drugs - specifically because this would be an investigational/off-label use; I find no evidence that the drug is approved for treating lichen planus, and there are ongoing clinical trials (which was also don't catalog in article space). — soupvector (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)