Talk:Antiemetic

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Untitled

Zolpidem's description currently reads like an advertisement —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.208.29 (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the advertisement like commentary. Other drugs also had too much commentary, so I reduced that too. They all have their own articles which can cover the specifics. OccamzRazor (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please weigh in at hyperemesis gravidarum regarding cannabinoids as antiemetics

Please go to the hyperemesis gravidarum talk page if you have an opinion about whether cannabinoids can or should be mentioned in that article's subsection for related to antiemetic medicines. (Hyperemesis gravidarum is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy.) Medical marijuana was first mentioned in the article in 2007 but a small set of new editors since January 22 have decided to utterly remove all references to cannabinoids. JonathanFreed (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

semiprotected

Vandalism lay unreverted for two hours. If any admin reads this and I am not around, and an IP wants to edit, I have no problem with unprotecting. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reference on use of propofol & benzodiezepines as antiemetics

I have never heard that propofol, an anesthetic, has been used for nausea & vomiting. I have heard about benzodiazepines, but I do not think they use them in practice and also I am not aware of the mechanism of antiemetic properties neither of propofol, nor for benzodiazepines. 688dim (talk) 23:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted alprazolam from 5HT3 inhibitors. Furthermore, I've never seen a benzodiazepine used as an antiemetic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.47.18 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antiemetic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Title change?

Hi, this article covers drugs only, but there exist non-drug antiemetic measures, and I wonder if the title should be changed to: Antiemetic remedies. So it could include measures such as diet, acupressure, etc., which have been recommended by the Amer Acad of Family Physicians as things to try first, before resorting to drugs, especially for pregnant women.Thinksthanks (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 20:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of diclectin?

or just vitamin B6 in general? 207.244.142.218 (talk) 04:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]