Talk:Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The ATC lists are up to date per 2022. The ATCvet lists are up to date per 2022.

2005 and 2006 updates

I plan on inputing the contents of http://www.whocc.no/filearchive/word/new2005.doc soon (within the next few weeks). Matt 02:10, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

done Matt 07:04, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The 2006 updates should all be included now. Matt 21:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some scraps from Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System for Human Medicines

I didn't include this when merging: "... is a classification system for drug substances that is maintained by the WHO Division of Drug Management and Policies (DMP)." "Used in Sweden, Czech republic. It is also used in WHO Essential Medicines Library." --Micha 14:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When was Wikipedia updated last?

The atc/ddd system is a yearly publication. In 2008-01 a new version was published at http://www.whocc.no/atcddd. They also publish yearly lists with changes and new codes with regard to the previous version.

When was wikipedia updated last? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.145.136.26 (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ATC 2009 updates and ATCvet

The 2009 updates are now included, as well as the ATCvet codes (~~except for ATCvet code QI02 to ATCvet code QI20~~ now included. ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)). Some of the older 5th level additions (2007, 2008) might still be missing, though. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ATC/ATCvet update 2010

The ATC update 2010 is now implemented. The ATCvet update hasn't been published yet, but I'll keep an eye on it. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ATCvet update 2010 implemented. Wikipedia is faster than the WHO ;-) --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 09:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ATC/ATCvet update 2011

ATC update 2011 included. ATCvet 2011 is not yet published. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 15:01, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ATCvet update 2011 implemented. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updates after 2011

The latest updated year is now shown in an info box at the top of this page. If you update the ATC(vet) lists, please make sure to change {{ATC codes lead/UpdateYear}} and {{ATC codes lead/UpdateYear vet}} to reflect your updates. Thanks, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: WHO ATC vs. EPhMRA ATC

Can we add some clarification between the WHO ATC and the very similar, but slightly different, EPhMRA ATC?

Maybe a link to a Wiki page for the EPhMRA classifications or a line about "not to be confused with". I often refer to the EPhMRA codes as simply 'ATC' and can't be the only one who has come to this page looking for the wrong code set.

I'm not an expert, but I found this article on the subject: http://www.ephmra.org/user_uploads/who-atc%202013%20final.pdf

Diantose (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Sarah[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out! I must admit I've never heard of that classification. I will try to do a bit of reading and add some information here. We don't even have an article on the EPhMRA... --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150806013259/http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_publications/guidelines/ to http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_publications/guidelines/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology § ATC for new drugs

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology § ATC for new drugs. Petersam (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]