Talk:Amoxapine

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Is this tricyclic or tetracyclic?

Its classification is ambiguous, as is its apparent structure. 60.224.48.152 09:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to this site...

Well, according to this site it's a tricyclic, will try to get it confirmed though. But page looks solid. But agreed, counting four rings, it's listed under tricyclics though and in article it's named as tetracyclic, which struck me as kind of odd. I'll have to ask my psychiatrist.

http://www.mentalhealth.com/drug/p30-a03.html--Rodidrepnu 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too many templates!

This page is appearing at Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded - which means it cannot display all the templates included. Near the end of the source code you will see

<!-- 
NewPP limit report
Preprocessor node count: 32731/1000000
Post-expand include size: 2048000/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 1639823/2048000 bytes
Expensive parser function count: 0/500
-->

The only way to improve the page rendering is to remove unnecessary templates (or subst them)  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amoxapine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]