Talk:Adams–Stokes syndrome

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Medicine: Cardiology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Adams–Stokes syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

On

On the "Signs and symptoms" part , you wrote

...Breathing continues normally throughout the attack...

As far as I know that is not true.You might see respiratory pauses during the attack.Please fix.

Here's a link : [1] --NatK 01:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intro does not make sense

The intro says nothing about what it is and is not grammatically correct (excluding content in parentheses): "Stokes–Adams syndrome the first description of the syndrome was published in 1717 by the Carniolan physician of Slovene descent Marko Gerbec, which was 44 years after its publication quoted by Giovanni Battista Morgagni." Someone with experience should revise this. It does not make good sense even based on the grammar too... Moresonic (talk) 07:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the lead. Noca2plus (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

???

Is this article orphaned? Syntax and grammar seem a bit off imo...

Rettetasten (talk) 19:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Adams–Stokes syndrome

On

Intro does not make sense

???

Navigation menu

Search